Сегодня 01 октября 2020
Медикус в соцсетях
 
Задать вопрос

ЗАДАТЬ ВОПРОС РЕДАКТОРУ РАЗДЕЛА (ответ в течение нескольких дней)

Представьтесь:
E-mail:
Не публикуется
служит для обратной связи
Антиспам - не удалять!
Ваш вопрос:
Получать ответы и новости раздела
19 декабря 2001 00:00   |   Giuseppe D'Ancona, MD, Hratch Karamanoukian, MD, Thomas Lajos, MD,

Posterior Thoracotomy for Reoperative Coronary Artery Bypass

 
 
 
ABSTRACT
Background: This retrospective study evaluates morbidity and 
 
mortality of reoperative coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG)
without cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB) using a posterior thoracotomy
to revascularize the lateral aspect of the heart.
Methods: From January 1995 to July 1999, reoperative CABG without
CPB was performed on 67 selected patients using a left posterior
thoracotomy approach. Preoperative risk factors, postoperative
mortality, and major complications were derived from the New York 
 
State database.
Results: All patients were operated on without CPB. A total of 1.3
grafts per patient were performed. Freedom from major complications
was 95.5%. There were no postoperative cerebro-vascular accidents
(CVA) or new neurological deficits. Two patients (3%) had a 
 
perioperative acute myocardial infarction. The actual mortality rate 
 
was 4.5% (3/67), the expected mortality was 5.1% and the calculated
risk adjusted mortality was 2.1%.
Conclusions: Reoperative CABG without CPB to revascularize selected
coronary artery targets can be safely performed using a posterior
thoracotomy approach.
INTRODUCTION
Alternative surgical strategies have evolved over the last few years
to decrease the risks of reoperative CABG. Use of different surgical
incisions to avoid sternal reentry [Knight 1987, Grandjbakhch 1989,
Grosner 1990], minimization of graft and aortic manipulation to 
 
decrease the possibility of embolism («no-touch» technique) [Savage
1994], and amelioration of the methods of myocardial protection to 
 
limit the ischemic damage [Buckberg 1989] have all been included in 
 
the surgical armamentarium of reoperative CABG. Avoidance of CPB has 
 
been recently introduced and added as a strategy to limit the 
 
invasiveness of primary CABG [Calafiore 1996, Bergsland 1998] and 
 
its advantages have been particularly emphasized in patients at high 
 
risk for conventional CABG [D'Ancona 1999b]. This technique has been 
 
proposed as a safe alternative in reoperations, especially when 
 
associated with alternative surgical approaches to revascularize
target areas of myocardium [Grandjean 1996, Akhter 1997, Boonstra
1997, Fonger 1997]. We herein report our experience with off-CPB
reoperative CABG using a left postero-lateral thoracotomy to 
 
revascularize the lateral aspect of the myocardium.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
Reoperative CABG without CPB via a left posterior thoracotomy was 
 
performed on 67 selected patients from January 1995 to July 1999.
This surgical approach was adopted in cases of recurrent coronary
artery disease (CAD) limited to the lateral wall of the heart.
Surgical technique
We started to use this approach for reoperative CABG in 1971 
 
utilizing femoral cannulation for CPB [Grosner 1990]. In the last 
 
several years, CPB has been avoided in the majority of cases. After
induction with general anesthesia and double lumen endotracheal
intubation, the patient was positioned for a standard left 
 
posterolateral thoracotomy. An incision was then made 4 cm below the 
 
tip of the scapula towards the left mid-axillary line and was 
 
extended posteriorly towards the spine. The chest was entered
through the 6th intercostal space after dividing the latissimus
dorsi muscle and opening the thoracic fascia. The left lung was 
 
collapsed and the pericardium was opened posterior to the phrenic
nerve. This exposure provided access to all obtuse marginal (OM) 
 
branches of the circumflex system and posterolateral coronary artery
(PLA) branches.
After analysis of the adhesions, the target site had been selected
on either the native coronary or the hood of an old graft.
Intravenous heparin was administered. The coronary stabilizer
platform (CTS; Cupertino, CA) was positioned and proximal snaring of 
 
the coronary artery was achieved with a 4−0 Prolene® pledgetted
suture. After 3 minutes of ischemic preconditioning, the target
vessel was opened. An appropriate size intracoronary shunt was 
 
placed within the vessel and the snare was released to prevent
further myocardial ischemia. Distal anastomoses were performed with 
 
7−0 Prolene® running suture using a blower-aerosolizer to improve
visibility during the procedure. The graft was then anastomosed
proximally to the partially clamped descending thoracic aorta.
Transit time flow measurement (TTFM) was used to confirm graft
patency. Flow curves and flow values were recorded in the flowmeter
hardware (Medistim Butterfly; Medistim, Oslo, Norway).
If combined revascularization of the left anterior descending (LAD)
and circumflex coronary artery territory was needed, the incision
was extended anteriorly, gaining access to the anterior aspect of 
 
the heart. In this case harvesting of the left internal mammary
artery, whenever available, was performed, and the conduit was used 
 
to revascularize either the LAD or the OM branches.
Data collection and statistical analysis
All data regarding this group of patients were entered in the New 
 
York State Database and retrospectively analyzed. Operative priority
was defined as emergent when severity and distribution of CAD, along
with hemodynamic instability, mandated immediate surgery.
In regard to perioperative outcomes, perioperative stroke was 
 
defined as any new neurologic event lasting more than 24 hours after
the operation. Perioperative acute myocardial infarction (AMI) was 
 
defined as an abnormal elevation of cardiac enzymes (CK-MB,
troponin-T) accompanied or not by 12 lead EKG changes. Respiratory
failure was defined as the need for ventilatory support for 48 hours
or more, postoperatively. The absence of any postoperative
complication was referred to as «freedom from complications». Actual
mortality was defined as in-hospital within 30 days from the 
 
operation. Expected mortality rate reflected preoperative risk 
 
factors. Risk-adjusted mortality rate was calculated by dividing the 
 
actual mortality by the expected mortality and multiplying the 
 
result by the New York State mortality rate.
RESULTS
Demographic data are summarized in Table 1. Mean age was 65.4 years
(range: 47−80 years). There were 60 males (89.6%) and 7 females
(10.4%). All patients had undergone at least one operation for CAD,
6 patients (9%) had already been operated on twice and two patients
(3%) three times. A total of 1.3 grafts per patient were performed.
Data regarding the type of conduits used and the target coronary
arteries are summarized in Table 2.
There were no conversions to CPB or to median sternotomy. Mortality
and morbidity rates are reported in Table 3. No strokes or 
 
postoperative neurological deficits were reported. Two patients (3%)
developed a postoperative AMI. Freedom from complications was 95.5%.
Average hospitalization after surgery was 8 days. Actual mortality
was 4.5% (3/67), expected mortality was 5.1% and risk-adjusted
mortality was 2.1%. Two patients (3%) died from left ventricular
failure and in one case (1.5%) respiratory failure occurred
accompanied by acute pancreatitis and sepsis. Intraoperative TTFM 
 
was adopted to document patency in 43 grafts. Flows were measured
with and without proximal snaring of the native coronary artery and 
 
all grafts tested were patent by TTFM.
DISCUSSION
The referral pattern for CABG has been changing including an 
 
increasing number of high-risk patients. In this regard, it has been 
 
estimated that 17% of the patients, previously submitted for CABG,
will need re-operation within 12 years [He 1995]. To circumvent the 
 
deleterious complications of reoperative CABG, attention has been 
 
focused on alternative surgical strategies aimed at improving
myocardial protection and at reducing manipulation of the heart,
aorta, and old grafts. Appropriate use of antegrade and retrograde
cardioplegia in re-operations has, for example, been shown to reduce
mortality to levels as low as 3.4% [Lytle 1987]. Similarly, the use 
 
of a variety of surgical techniques, such as «no-touch» dissection
and single aortic cross-clamping, has been shown to decrease
operative mortality [Salerno 1982, Savage 1994].
Although the above-mentioned techniques have decreased the risks of 
 
reoperative CABG, the complications related to the use of CPB are 
 
still present, especially whenever long perfusion periods are 
 
required during reoperations. Long CPB time has been identified as 
 
the most powerful independent predictor of mortality after
reoperative CABG [He 1995]. In this regard, avoidance of CPB may be 
 
proposed as a valuable alternative to treat recurrent CAD.
To further contain the risks of this already highly compromised
population, use of alternative surgical approaches can be suggested
to revascularize, off-CPB, limited areas of the myocardium avoiding
the hazards of resternotomy and limiting manipulation on the 
 
ascending aorta, heart, and old grafts. Different approaches have 
 
been proposed to achieve an off-CPB revascularization of target
coronary artery branches in the setting of reoperative CABG.
Boonstra et al. [Boonstra 1997] first suggested the use of a left 
 
anterior small thoracotomy (LAST) with anastomosis of the left 
 
internal mammary artery (LIMA) to the LAD to treat recurrent CAD 
 
involving the LAD. Grandjean et al. proposed a subxiphoid approach
with harvesting of the right gastroepiploic artery (RGEA) to reach,
off-CPB, isolated lesions of the RCA system [Grandjean 1996].
Revascularization of recurrent isolated lesions of the circumflex
system can be achieved via a left postero-lateral thoracotomy. This 
 
approach was first performed using the femoral vessels for 
 
institution of CPB [Knight 1987, Grandjbakhch 1989, Grosner 1990],
and only later the same conceptual framework was adopted without CPB 
 
[Fonger 1997, Baumgartner 1999].
Even if the advantages offered by these alternative surgical
approaches seem to be intuitively evident, there is still a limited
number of comparative studies with traditional reoperative coronary
artery surgery. Miyaji et al. [Miyaji 1999] demonstrated similar
results between primary and reoperative CABG performed off-CPB.
Allen et al. [Allen 1997] showed a significant decrease in the rate 
 
of atrial fibrillation, number of transfusions and ICU length of 
 
stay when comparing a group of patients reoperated upon via LAST 
 
with a group of conventional redo operations with disease limited to 
 
the LAD.
Absence of strokes, low rate of periopeartive AMI (3%) and high rate 
 
of freedom from complications (95.5%), have been reported in our 
 
experience with reoperative CABG off-CPB via left thoracotomy. These
results are very encouraging and are similar to those proposed for 
 
larger groups operated on with conventional CPB and via median
sternotomy [Lytle 1987, Loop 1990, Aranki 1994, Savage 1994].
Operative mortality in reoperative CABG varies between 3.4% and 
 
12.5% with a median of 8% [He 1995]. In our experience, a rate of 
 
4.5% reflects the results published by other authors using
conventional surgical techniques on CPB [Lytle 1987, Loop 1990,
Aranki 1994, Savage 1994, He 1995].
The feasibility of reoperative CABG off-pump via median sternotomy
is not well documented, and exposure of the lateral coronary artery
branches, i.e. circumflex system, can be troublesome if meticulous
lysis of the pericardial adhesions is not performed before using the 
 
modern techniques of elevation and stabilization of the heart.
Revascularization of the lateral vessels of the heart without CPB 
 
through median sternotomy has been made easier since the 
 
introduction of the «single suture» technique in the oblique sinus
of the pericardium [Karamanoukian 1999] in conjunction with modern
stabilization systems. Despite that, a posterior-thoracotomy
approach can result in better and safer coronary exposure in 
 
patients with recurrent CAD, extended and limited to the circumflex
coronary system.
In our experience a total number of 1.3 grafts per patient, as above
reported, appears to be very reductive. It has to be emphasized that 
 
all patients referred for this procedure had limited CAD localized
to the lateral aspect of the heart and complete myocardial
revascularization was performed in all cases.
Lack of clinical and angiographic follow-up is an important
limitation of our study and, for this reason we have limited our 
 
discussion to the intraoperative and perioperative results. Partial
documentation of intraoperative graft patency was obtained via TTFMs
in 41 grafts. This technology has been demonstrated to be 
 
particularly useful to detect, and eventually correct, critical
anastomotic lesions [Cerrito 1999, D'Ancona 1999a, D'Ancona (in
press)].
In conclusion, our results indicate that reoperative CABG for CAD,
extended and limited to the circumflex system, can be safely
performed via a left posterior thoracotomy without CPB, limiting
postoperative morbidity and mortality. Extensive dissection and 
 
manipulation of the heart and old grafts can be avoided thereby
minimizing the risks for embolism and achieving revascularization of 
 
culprit coronary lesions. Median sternotomy or other surgical
approaches should be, on the contrary, performed if the CAD is not 
 
limited to the circumflex system aiming always to a complete
myocardial revascularization. Acquisition of enough confidence with 
 
the modern techniques of coronary exposure, stabilization and 
 
shunting, as used during primary operations off-CPB, is mandatory
before performing this operation as a redo. Clinical and 
 
angiographic follow-up in prospective randomized studies are 
 
necessary to better define limits and indications of this very 
 
promising technique.
REVIEW AND COMMENTARY
1. Editorial Board Member L023 writes:
This is a nicely written paper, with a sufficient number of 
 
patients, albeit without medium or long-term follow-up of an 
 
approach to redo revascularization.
a) The author should comment on whether all patients had «total
revascularization» redo surgery or only major target vessels
revascularized with this approach. Their indications for selecting
this approach should also be more fully discussed.
b) Their statistics in terms of the % number of redo cases that this 
 
cohort formed would also be of interest, as the number of redo cases
approached by other minimally invasive/off-pump approaches.
Author(s)' Response by Giuseppe D'Ancona, MD:
a) All patients had complete myocardial revascularization. Coronary
artery branches that at angiography were determined to have very 
 
poor quality and to be bad surgical targets were not revascularized.
This approach was chosen only for patients with coronary artery
disease limited to the marginal branches. If other coronaries were 
 
amenable to surgical treatment, a median sternotomy was preferred.
b) In the same period of time a total of 274 patients underwent
reoperative CABG off-CPB and 307 on-CPB. In the off-CPB group, 122 
 
patients had a median sternotomy (44.5%), and the remaining patients
were treated with alternative surgical approaches (posterior
thoracotomy, LAST-RAST, subxiphoid with RGEA). More specific data 
 
can not be disclosed and has already been submitted for publication.
2. Editorial Board Member EE455 writes:
The lateral thoracotomy approach should become standard for this 
 
peculiar and marginal group of patients presented with isolated
lateral lesions and patent grafts or native vessels on the anterior
and inferior walls.
a) The operative results are not reported. Neither the graft
patency, which is discussed by the authors, nor the effects on 
 
angina recurrence.
b)The authors assess that this approach is feasible with results as 
 
good as those provided by median sternotomy. In my experience, the 
 
PT approach is much easier technically, thus faster than sternotomy.
It requires less dissection of the pericardial adhesions and less 
 
blood loss are to be expected in this very marginal group of 
 
patients. I think the advantages should be stressed.
c) We have combined this approach with TMLR on the anterior aspect
of the heart in four cases. Do the authors have an opinion on this 
 
type of hybrid approach, which increases the potential indications
to patients with antero-lateral viability not due to complete
classical revascularization?
d) Conversion to sternotomy, which has not happened in the cohort,
would be very difficult in this position. In case of emergency, CPB 
 
should be instituted through a groin incision, thus mandating a 
 
preoperative assessment of the ilio femoral vasculature. This point
might be highlighted.
Author(s)' Response by Giuseppe D'Ancona, MD:
a) As already specified by the title («perioperative results») and 
 
discussed in the manuscript, we are perfectly conscious of the 
 
limitations of the study and the lack of angiographic and clinical
follow-up.
b) It is obvious that avoidance of resternotomy can decrease the 
 
risks of injury on vital structures and reduce manipulation of the 
 
heart, old grafts and large vessels. On the other hand, the PT 
 
approach can be extremely difficult and adequate exposure and 
 
stabilization of the coronary targets can be very troublesome. We 
 
suggest adopting this approach only after having acquired enough
experience with off-CPB primary operations.
c) We do not have experience with TMLR and the clinical
applicability of this technology is still very controversial.
d) Conversion to sternotomy is almost always not necessary and 
 
femoral vessels can be cannulated for CPB. We do not routinely
perform perioperative assessment of the groin vessels. This is a 
 
very good point, probably applicable to all reoperative CABG
patients.
3. Editorial Board Member EK34 writes:
This is a nice relatively large series of a highly selected group.
The data should be a gold-standard for this patient group. The 
 
author must use the STS definition of mortality [~] «all deaths
occurring during the hospitalization in which the operation was 
 
performed. Those deaths occurring after hospitalization but within
30 days of the procedure….Those deaths occurring after 30 days 
 
that are clearly related to the surgical procedure will also be 
 
counted as operative mortality».
Author(s)' Response by Giuseppe D'Ancona, MD:
We have not yet reviewed our follow-up data for this group of 
 
patients. We can only consider the in-hospital mortality and, for 
 
this reason, the STS definition of mortality is not applicable in 
 
this particular case.
4. Editorial Board Member AR11 writes:
The authors need to detail the information on their patient group
(from how big an overall group of revascularization patients were 
 
they selected; 67 patients in a 4.5 year interval doesn't sound like 
 
very many). Comparison data to other reops in their institution
might be helpful, and certainly interesting, for the reader.
Author(s)' Response by Giuseppe D'Ancona, MD:
A total of 274 patients underwent off-CPB reoperative CABG in the 
 
same period of time. Different surgical approaches were used on the 
 
basis of the extension of the coronary artery disease. A total of 
 
307 patients were reoperated on using CPB. A lower incidence of 
 
postoperative CVA was recorded in the off-CPB group together with a 
 
higher rate of freedom from major complications. More extensive data 
 
have been submitted for publication and can not be discussed.
5. Editorial Board Member MN93 writes:
This is an innovative approach for re-op surgery where access to the 
 
descending thoracic aorta is required. A more anterior approach,
«muscle-sparing,» is better if LIMA or LIMA-radial grafts are used.
Author(s)' Response by Giuseppe D'Ancona, MD:
A more anterior incision facilitates harvesting of the LIMA. In this 
 
case, revascularization of the circumflex territory with the 
 
pedicled LIMA can be achieved only after having extended the 
 
incision posteriorly to gain adequate surgical exposure.
AUTHOR/ARTICLE INFORMATION
Reprint requests to: Hratch Karamanoukian, MD, Kaleida
Health–Buffalo General Hospital Site, 100 High Street, Buffalo, New 
 
York 14203; Phone: (716) 859−1080, Fax: (716) 859−4687
Submitted on: February 15, 2000; Accepted on: February 16, 2000
REFERENCES
1. Akhter M, Lajos T, Grosner G, Bergsland J, Salerno T.
Reoperations with the right gastroepiploic artery without
cardiopulmonary bypass. J Card Surg 12:210−4, 1997. :9591172:
2. Allen KB, Matheny RG, Robison RJ, et al. Minimally invasive
versus conventional reoperative coronary artery bypass. Ann Thorac
Surg 64:616−22, 1997. :9307447:
3. Aranki SF, Rizzo RJ, Adams DH, et al. The single cross-clamp
technique: An important adjunct to myocardial and cerebral
protection in coronary operations. Ann Thorac Surg 58:296−303, 1994.
:8067823:
4. Baumgartner FJ, Gheissari A, Panagiotides GP. Off-pump obtuse
marginal grafting with local stabilization: Thoracotomy approach in 
 
reoperations. Ann Thorac Surg 68:946−8, 1999. :10509989:
5. Bergsland J, Schmid S, Yanulevich J, Hasnain S, Lajos TZ, Salerno
TA. Coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) without cardiopulmonary
bypass (CPB): A strategy for improving results in surgical
revascularization. Heart Surgery Forum # 1998−1593 1(2):107−10,
1998. :861:
6. Boonstra PW, Grandjean JG, Mariani MA. Reoperative coronary
artery bypass grafting without cardiopulmonary bypass through a 
 
small thoracotomy. Ann Thorac Surg 63:405−7, 1997. :9033309:
7. Buckberg GD. Antegrade/retrograde blood cardioplegia to ensure
cardioplegic distribution: Operative techniques and objectives. J 
 
Card Surg 4:216−38, 1989. :2520001:
8. Calafiore AM, Di Giammarco GD, Teodori G, et al. Left anterior
descending coronary artery grafting via a left anterior small
thoracotomy without cardiopulmonary bypass. Ann Thorac Surg 
 
61:1658−63, 1996. :8651765:
9. Cerrito PB, Koenig SC, Van Himbergen DJ, et al. Neural network
pattern recognition analysis of graft flow characteristics improves
intra-operative anastomotic error detection in minimally invasive
CABG. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 16:88−93, 1999. :10456409:
10. D'Ancona G, Karamanoukian H, Salerno T, Schmid S, Bergsland J.
Flow Measurement in Coronary Surgery. Heart Surgery Forum
#1999−03815 2(2):121−124, 1999. :485:
11. D'Ancona G, Karamanoukian H, Soltoski P, Salerno T, Bergsland J.
Changing referral pattern in off-pump coronary artery bypass
surgery: A strategy for improving surgical results. Heart Surgery
Forum #1999−4534 2(3):246−9, 1999. :713:
12. D'Ancona G, Karamanoukian H, Ricci M, Bergsland J, Schmid S,
Salerno T. Graft revision after Transit Time Flow Measurement in 
 
off-pump coronary artery bypass grafting. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 
 
(in press).
13. Fonger JD, Doty JR, Sussman MS, et al. Lateral MIDCAB grafting
via limited posterior thoracotomy. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 
 
12:399−405, 1997. :9332918:
14. Grandjbakhch I, Acar C, Cabrol C. Left thoracotomy approach for 
 
coronary bypass grafting in patients with pericardial adhesions. Ann 
 
Thorac Surg 48:871−3, 1989. :2596929:
15. Grandjean JG, Mariani MA, Ebels T. Coronary reoperation via 
 
small laparotomy using right gastroepiploic artery without
cardiopulmonary bypass. Ann Thorac Surg 61:1853−5, 1996. :8651810:
16. Grosner G, Lajos TZ, Schimert G, Bergsland J. Left thoracotomy
reoperation for coronary artery disease. J Card Surg 5:304−8, 1990.
:2133861:
17. He GW, Acuff TE, Ryan WH, He YH, Mack MJ. Determinants of 
 
operative mortality in reoperative CABG. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 
 
110:971−8, 1995. :7475163:
18. Karamanoukian HL, Bergsland J, Salerno TA. «Single suture»
technique to help expose the heart for complete revascularization
without cardiopulmonary bypass. Ann Thorac Surg 68:1428−30, 1999.
:10543532:
19. Knight JL, Cohn LH. Left thoracotomy and femoro-femoral bypass
for reoperative revascularization of the posterior coronary
circulation. J Card Surg 2:343−9, 1987. :2979983:
20. Loop FD, Lytle BW, Cosgrove DM, et al. Reoperation for coronary
atherosclerosis. Changing pratice in 2509 consecutive patients. Ann 
 
Surg 212:378−86, 1990. :2396889:
21. Lytle BW, Loop FD, Cosgrove DM, et al. Fifteen hundred coronary
reoperations: results and determinants of early and late survival. J 
 
Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 93:847−59, 1987. :3494885:
22. Miyaji K, Wolf RK, Flege JB. Minimally invasive direct coronary
artery bypass for redo patients. Ann Thorac Surg 67:1677−81, 1999.
:10391274:
23. Salerno TA. Single cross-clamping period for the proximal and 
 
distal anastomoses in coronary surgery: An alternative to 
 
conventional techniques. Ann Thorac Surg 33:518−20, 1982. :7082092:
24. Savage EB, Cohn LH. «No-touch» dissection, antegrade-retrograde
blood cardioplegia, and single aortic cross-clamp significantly
reduce operative mortality of reoperative CABG. Circulation 90(part
2):II−140−3, 1994. :7955242:

Поделиться:




Комментарии
Смотри также
19 декабря 2001  |  00:12
Totally endoscopic myocardial revascularization (experimental study).
Totally endoscopic myocardial revascularization (experimental study).
19 декабря 2001  |  00:12
Technical Tips and Pitfalls in OPCAB Surgery: The Buffalo
Technical Tips and Pitfalls in OPCAB Surgery: The Buffalo
18 декабря 2001  |  00:12
Как пробиться на международную арену
Как пробиться на международную арену
17 декабря 2001  |  00:12
Aortic valve sparing operations: an update
Aortic valve sparing operations: an update
17 декабря 2001  |  00:12
"Bow-tie" mitral valve repair: an adjuvant technique for ischemic mitral regurgitation
"Bow-tie" mitral valve repair: an adjuvant technique for ischemic mitral regurgitation