Сегодня 17 сентября 2019
Медикус в соцсетях
 
Задать вопрос

ЗАДАТЬ ВОПРОС РЕДАКТОРУ РАЗДЕЛА (ответ в течение нескольких дней)

Представьтесь:
E-mail:
Не публикуется
служит для обратной связи
Антиспам - не удалять!
Ваш вопрос:
Получать ответы и новости раздела
19 декабря 2001 00:00

Comparison of Ministernotomy with Minithoracotomy Regarding

 
ABSTRACT
 
Purpose: This prospective clinical study focuses on postoperative
pain and internal mammary artery (IMA) characteristics after
ministernotomy versus left anterior minithoracotomy.
Method: Patients were studied in two groups. Group A consisted of 
 
267 consecutive single vessel (IMA to left anterior descending
artery (LAD)) minimally invasive direct coronary artery bypass
(MIDCAB) patients using ministernotomy from the tip of the xiphoid
to the fourth intercostal space. Group B consisted of the same 
 
number of MIDCAB patients operated on through anterolateral
minithoracotomy. Pain was graduated using the visual analog scale
(VAS). Internal mammary artery (IMA) characteristics were compared
in both the groups.
Results: Postoperative pain was not significant statistically on 
 
postop day (POD) 1 in either of the groups (p = 0.07). From POD 2 
 
onwards Group A patients had less pain than Group B patients (p <
0.05), and the pain medication requirement from POD 2 onwards was 
 
less in Group A than in Group B. Length of harvested IMA was 15.6 ± 
 
2.1 cm in Group A as compared to 10.4 ± 2.2 cm in Group B (p <
0.05). Free flow of IMA in group A was 56 ± 16 ml/min., whereas in 
 
Group B the flow was 50 ± 14 ml/min. (p = 0.04).
Conclusion: Compared to patients undergoing MIDCAB using
ministernotomy, anterolateral minithoracotomy patients suffer more 
 
pain from POD 2 onwards and their postoperative pain medication
requirement is also higher. Length and free flow of IMA is better in 
 
patients operated on for MIDCAB using ministernotomy. Thus,
ministernotomy is a better approach than minithoracotomy in terms of 
 
postoperative pain and IMA characteristics for single-vessel MIDCAB
patients.
 
INTRODUCTION
 
 
Since the inception of coronary revascularization, coronary bypass
surgery on the beating heart has been practiced. With the advent and 
 
evolution of the heart-lung machine and cardioplegia, the realm of 
 
bypass surgery on a still heart expanded and beating heart surgery
took a backseat. With the recent interest in minimally invasive
procedures, the beating heart surgical techniques have been revived.
The minimally invasive direct coronary artery bypass (MIDCAB) has 
 
been used primarily for grafting the left internal mammary artery
(LIMA) to the left anterior descending artery (LAD) through left 
 
anterior thoracotomy, and has gained acceptance as a less invasive
option.
To combine adequate access with a smaller scar, less pain and 
 
reduced respiratory discomfort as well as shorter hospital stay, the 
 
ministerotomy approach has been proposed. We began using
ministernotomy approach for MIDCAB at the Escorts Heart Institute
and Research Centre in October 1998. The aim of the present study is 
 
to present our experience with ministernotomy approach and a 
 
comparison between ministernotomy and left anterior minithoracotomy.
PATIENTS AND METHODS
From October 1998 until December 1999, ministernotomy was performed
at our institute on 267 patients and compared with the same number
of patients operated on by left anterior minithoracotomy. Informed
consent was obtained from all the patients, and approval was 
 
obtained from the institutional review board.
ANESTHESIA TECHNIQUE
All patients received tablet lorazepam and morphine sulfate
intramuscularly as premedication. Anesthesia was induced with 
 
midazolam, fentanyl citrate, thiopentone sodium, and orotracheal
intubation was facilitated with vecuronium bromide. Anesthesia was 
 
maintained with fentanyl and isoflurane in oxygen and intermittent
vecuronium. Hypothermia was prevented by use of warming fluids and a 
 
warm water mattress. Monitoring consisted of pulse oxymetry,
capnography, ventilatory parameters, two-lead EKG (II and V5) with 
 
ST trending, direct arterial pressure, pulmonary artery pressure,
segmental wall motion anomaly with transesophageal echocardiography
(TEE), and urine output and rectal temperature.
Patients were extubated when they met extubation criteria.
SURGICAL TECHNIQUE
Minithoracotomy
The patients are positioned supine with slight elevation of the side 
 
to be operated. Left anterior thoracotomy is performed through the 
 
fourth intercostal space (ICS) for LIMA dissection. In the initial
patients fourth left costal cartilage was excised to facilitate LIMA 
 
harvesting, but this was abandoned subsequently.
The internal mammary artery (IMA) is always harvested under direct
vision. The Chestwall retractor or the Cardio Thoracic Systems (CTS)
(Cardio Thoracic Systems, Inc. Cupertino CA) or Genzyme stabilizer
system (Genzyme Surgical Products, Cambridge MA) is used to 
 
facilitate IMA harvesting. A vertical incision is then made into the 
 
pericardium and stay sutures placed. Traction on these sutures
elevates the heart into the incision, improving visualization of the 
 
LAD. After administration of heparin sulfate (1.5 mg/kg), a 3−0 
 
polypropylene suture with a silastic rubber bolster is placed
proximal to the target area on the LAD or right coronary artery
(RCA) to be bypassed. The internal mammary artery is prepared for 
 
the anastomosis and local stabilization of the target vessel is done 
 
either by the CTS or Genzyme stabilizer. The anastomosis between
LIMA to LAD is performed using two 7−0 polypropylene sutures
separately for the heel and apex. During anastomosis, the operating
field is kept clear of blood by blowing moist oxygen through a 
 
sterile intravenous cannula. A pleural drain is placed and the wound
is closed in layers.
Ministernotomy
A vertical midline skin incision 6−8 cm in length is made starting
from the fourth intercostal space (ICS) to the tip of the xiphoid
process. The soft tissue overlying the sternum is mobilized and a 
 
median sternotomy from the tip of the xiphoid process to the fourth
ICS is performed. If the sternum is very stiff, the lateral
extension of the sternotomy is done on the left or right side 
 
depending upon which mammary artery is to be harvested, with the 
 
help of an oscillating saw. The complete length of the IMA can be 
 
harvested with the help of a long-tip electrocautery under direct
vision. Heparin (1.5 mg/kg) is administered, and the mammary artery
is divided distally and prepared for grafting. The pericardium is 
 
incised vertically and heavy sutures are applied to elevate the 
 
heart. Almost the whole length of the LAD can be visualized. An 
 
appropriate site of the LAD is selected for the anastomosis and,
proximal to the site of the anastomosis, occlusion of the LAD is 
 
done with a 3−0 polypropylene suture with a silastic rubber bolster.
If there are any hemodynamic or ECG changes, an appropriate-sized
intracoronary shunt is used to allow distal perfusion during the 
 
anastomosis. Distal occlusion is never used. The local area is then 
 
stabilized with a mechanical stabilizer (CTS or Genzyme) and an 
 
arteriotomy is performed. A bloodless field is obtained with the use 
 
of a blower. The internal mammary artery is divided proximal to the 
 
bifurcation and prepared for the anastomosis. The mammary artery to 
 
coronary artery anastomosis is performed with a running 7−0 
 
polypropylene suture. The IMA pedicle is tacked to the epicardium
after completion of anastomosis, and a trough is cut in the 
 
pericardium to prevent kinking of the IMA pedicle. Hemostasis is 
 
ensured. A chest tube is then placed in the pericardium well 
 
extending into the pleura, or a separate chest tube is placed in the
pleura.
Assessment of Surgery
In both minithoracotomy and ministernotomy, patency of the graft is 
 
assessed by Doppler flow prior to the chest closure, and angiography
is performed on the fourth postoperative day.
Pain was assessed with a visual analog scale (VAS) score on a scale
of 0 to 10, with 0 referring to no pain and 10 referring to 
 
unbearable pain. The patients had been instructed in the use of the 
 
scale preoperatively. Postoperatively, after endotracheal
extubation, the VAS score was noted every two hours for the next 12 
 
hours, and thenceforth every four hours until the fourth
postoperative day. Scores were recorded by independent nurse
observers who were blinded to the technique used. All analgesic
dosages were administered based on the VAS score, as noted by 
 
blinded nurse observers. After endotracheal extubation, analgesia
was provided with 30 mg of intramuscular ketrolac tromethamine
(Ranbaxy Labs, Delhi, India). The need for the initial dose and 
 
repeat dose in either group was determined by a VAS score of 6 or
more.
Free flow of the IMA was measured after harvesting and dividing the 
 
distal end of the IMA. The internal mammary artery was allowed to 
 
flow freely in a bowl for 30 seconds and the amount of the blood
collected is measured. The length of the harvested IMA is measured
with the help of black silk thread.
STATISTICAL ANALYSIS
The Student's t-test was applied for continuous variables between
the two groups. Comparison of categorical variables between two 
 
groups was conducted using cross tables with Pearson's Chi-Square
test if expected values were small, and the Fisher exact test was 
 
used if the expected values were high. A p value of < 0.05 was 
 
considered statistically significant.
 
RESULTS
 
 
Preoperative patient characteristics are shown in Table 1. There was 
 
no statistically significant difference in preoperative patient
parameters. Preoperative risk factors are depicted in Table 2 [see
Table 2]. Of patients older than 70 years, 56 (20.97%) were in the 
 
ministernotomy group and 52 (19.47%) were in the minithoracotomy
group. Forty-eight patients (17.97%) in the ministernotomy and 
 
forty-two patients (15.73%) in the minithoracotomy group had left 
 
ventricular ejection fractions (LVEFs) below 30%. These factors did 
 
not reach statistical significance.
During anastomosis, six patients in the ministernotomy group and 
 
four patients in the minithora-cotomy group had ST elevation in 
 
chest leads without any hemodynamic instability or regional wall 
 
motion abnormality on TEE. In all these patients, ECG changes
reverted to normal on completion of the anastomosis and release of 
 
the snare and the bulldog clamp applied on the LIMA. However two 
 
patients in the ministernotomy group and three patients in the 
 
minithoracotomy group had hemodynamic instability with regional wall 
 
motion abnormality on TEE along with ECG changes, which required
conversion to full sternotomy and cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB).
The harvested LIMA was significantly longer in ministernotomy
patients than in patients operated on through minithoracotomy [see
Table 3]. None of the patients required IMA extension in the 
 
ministernotomy group. In the minithoracotomy group, four patients
required IMA extension; the inferior epigastric artery (IEA) was 
 
used for the IMA extension in one patient and the reversed saphenous
vein was used in three patients.
Postoperative results and clinical outcome are presented in Table 4.
More ministernotomy patients than minithoracotomy patients were 
 
extubated in the operating room. Total blood loss was greater in 
 
patients operated on through ministernotomy than in minithoracotomy
patients (p < 0.01). This may be due to more loss of blood from the
sternotomy.
A postoperative Doppler flow study of LIMA-to-LAD was performed on 
 
all patients. Diastolic flow was excellent in 264 ministernotomy
patients and in 263 minithoracotomy patients. However, there was no 
 
diastolic flow in three ministernotomy patients (1.12%) and four 
 
minithoracotomy patients (1.49%), which was confirmed on 
 
angiography. One hundred and ten patients in each group underwent
postoperative angiography during their hospital stay, and the LIMA 
 
was found to be patent in all patients except those mentioned above.
One patient in the ministernotomy group and two patients in the 
 
minithoracotomy group required reoperation, for which the radial
artery was used as a conduit.
The mean VAS scores for the first 12 hours were not different
statiscally in both groups but did not reach statistical
significance except at the first two hours [see Table 5]. From 
 
second postoperative day (POD) onwards pain was significantly
greater in patients operated on through minithoracotomy as compared
with ministernotomy (p < 0.05) [see Figure 1]. By the time of 
 
discharge, pain levels had decreased in almost all the patients.
The mean postoperative ketorolac requirements were found to be lower
in the ministernotomy group (32.57 ± 14.67) than in the 
 
minithoracotomy group (48.27 ± 18.42), a difference that was found
to be statistically significant (p < 0.05).
One patient in each group (0.37%) died during hospital stay. The 
 
patient operated on through ministernotomy had acute renal shutdown,
and the minithoracotomy patient experienced massive gastrointestinal
bleeding following surgery.
Mean follow-up was 10 ± 1.5 months, with a follow-up rate of 95.88%
(256 of 267 patients) in the ministernotomy group and 94.38% (252 of 
 
267 patients) in the minithoracotomy group. Two hundred and fifty
patients in the ministernotomy group and 248 patients in the 
 
minithoracotomy group were in functional class I and had good 
 
diastolic flow on Doppler flow evaluation of the mammary coronary
anastomosis. Six patients in the ministernotomy group and four 
 
patients in the minithoracotomy group are in angina class II and are 
 
on medical therapy.
 
DISCUSSION
 
 
Less invasive procedures for surgical revascularization are being
proposed as a means of reducing operative trauma and the sequel of 
 
cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB) [Westaby 1996, Coulson 1998a]. These
new techniques attempt to reduce surgical trauma and thus 
 
postoperative pain, and give better cosmetic results. By avoiding
CPB, cerebrovascular, renal, and bleeding complications are 
 
significantly reduced. However, not all minimally invasive coronary
operations are performed with reduced surgical trauma. Lateral
thoracotomies can be quiet painful even if small in length. The 
 
thoracotomy approach, due to trauma to costal cartilages, may induce
more pain than that resulting from a median sternotomy [Heres 1998].
Intercostal nerve injury can cause very significant pain, chest wall 
 
splinting, hypoventilation, and respiratory compromise. Complete
mobilization of the IMA through a limited thoracotomy is difficult
and time-consuming.
By moving away from sternotomy, MIDCAB surgeons have revisited the 
 
known problems of thoracotomy and the side effects of pain 
 
management. In order for less invasive cardiac procedures to become
universally accepted by surgeons and patients alike, refinements are
needed.
Coulson et al. [Coulson 1998b] have described an alternative
technique, the «T-MIDCAB» procedure. By grafting a short segment of 
 
radial artery or saphenous vein between the undisturbed IMA and 
 
target coronary artery, complete thoracotomy is avoided and chest
wall retraction and perioperative pain are minimized. This 
 
procedure, however, is technically more demanding and requires an 
 
additional anastomosis between the donor vessel and the IMA.
The median sternotomy was originally described by Milton in 1897 and 
 
was popularized by Jullian in 1957 [Jullian 1957]. It eventually
became the universal method of exposure for most cardiac procedures.
Surgeons quickly realized that median sternotomy provided good 
 
exposure to every region of the heart, the great vessels, and the 
 
mediastinum. As its frequent use attests, surgeons are comfortable
with the median sternotomy because of the exposure of cardiac
structures that it provides. Until recent years, concerns about
wound trauma and the final appearance of the surgical scar were a 
 
low priority. However, now that the minimally invasive and 
 
«off-pump» surgeries have become widely practiced, other
considerations are surfacing. Cosmetic disadvantages of the full 
 
median sternotomy are obvious – a large and visible scar that 
 
remains a permanent reminder of an otherwise low-risk procedure. The 
 
safety advantages of reduced surgical trauma remain a cardinal
feature of all the modified techniques.
Several alternatives are currently available for accessing the 
 
thoracic cage that achieve adequate access with a smaller scar, less 
 
pain, and reduced respiratory discomfort as well as shorter hospital
stay. We have used lower ministernotomy primarily for grafting the 
 
LIMA to the LAD from the tip of the xiphoid process to the fourth
ICS. To create the exposure for harvesting the IMA and for the 
 
subxiphoid approach, we have used the Rultract retractor (Rultract
Inc., Cincinnati, OH) for providing vertical lift of the lower
sternal bone [see Figure 2] or we used the same Genzyme (Genzyme,
Inc., Cambridge, MA) retractor that we used for local stabilization
of the heart. A simple upward tilt exposes the IMA, which can be 
 
easily harvested. Complete visualization of the IMA as well as the 
 
LAD is achieved with great ease. In our study, the length of the 
 
harvested IMA was significantly longer in ministernotomy than in 
 
minithoracotomy. In minithoracotomies, the length of the harvested
IMA is a great limiting factor; at times it may be very difficult to 
 
harvest even a few centimeters more, especially in a laterally
situated LAD.
These results are achieved without debilitating musculoskeletal
trauma. In addition, conversion to either an extended transverse
incision or a standard median sternotomy can be done anytime that 
 
the need arises. All of these advantages are limited if surgery is 
 
done through minithoracotomy for a LIMA to LAD anastomosis.
Another advantage of ministernotomy for IMA harvesting and LIMA to 
 
LAD anastomosis is the lower learning curve as compared with the 
 
minithoracotomy approach. The same technique is used for IMA 
 
harvesting and for the anastomosis as in the standard median
sternotomy approach.
The port access system (Heart Port, Inc., Redwood City, CA), which
has also been used for coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) by 
 
some surgeons [Ribakove 1998], has the advantage of a limited
incision while still providing the comfort to perform the 
 
anastomosis on an arrested heart in a bloodless surgical field.
Factors that limit this technique are the necessity of establishing
extracorporeal circulation through femoral vessels and placement of 
 
the endoaortic clamp, in addition to the additional expenses for 
 
special instrumentation and the cardiopulmonary circuit kit.
Video-assisted endoscopic instrumentation [Nataf 1996] and robotic
assistance are also employed for minimally invasive CABG operations,
but these techniques are quite expensive, require special training
and are highly operator-dependent, and are not easily reproducible.
In the lower partial ministernotomy approach, the upper part of the 
 
sternum and the sterno-clavicular and manubriosternal joints are not 
 
disturbed, so the chances of sternal dehiscence are low, especially
in elderly patients and those with chronic obstructive pulmonary
disease (COPD). Because the chest is not widely opened, there is 
 
less risk of traction injuries to the brachial plexus. In addition,
the smaller incision and lower wound morbidity yield a more 
 
acceptable cosmetic result for patients [see Figure 3] In our series
we did not observe any sternal wound dehiscence in patients operated
on by ministernotomy.
It may be claimed that for single vessel disease, percutaneous
transluminal coronary angioplasty (PTCA), with or without stenting,
is the treatment of choice. The data from randomized studies
comparing PTCA with CABG consistently showed a similar incidence of 
 
death and myocardial infarction at one, three, and five years after
PTCA and CABG [Pocock 1995, BARI 1996]. Both treatment modalities
were equally effective in relieving angina [Pocock 1995]. The angina
relief, however, is achieved in patients treated with PTCA at the 
 
cost of a significantly higher need for repeat revascularization
during the first year [Pocock 1995, BARI 1996]. Obviously, PTCA does 
 
have its own intrinsic limitations. At the same time, significant
improvements in CABG techniques are being made, which renders PTCA 
 
and CABG complementary rather than strictly exclusive techniques,
especially in high-risk patients for whom a combination of the 
 
techniques (hybrid revascularization), may be more effective. We 
 
performed hybrid revascularization in eight patients (2.99%) in the 
 
ministernotomy group and in six patients (2.24%) in the 
 
minithoracotomy group, for whom complications included diffusely
diseased atheromatous aorta and impaired renal function. One of the 
 
limitations of PTCA is that the device must cross the target lesion
in order to perform its specialized function. In patients with 
 
chronic totally occluded arteries, distal lesions, and tortuous or 
 
small coronary arteries, and patients with complex type C lesion(s),
this is particularly challenging. These patients are difficult to 
 
treat despite improvements in catheter technology (guide-wire
design, balloon profile and material, and laser technology) [de
Jaegere 1997]. Another limiting factor for PTCA is late luminal
renarrowing or restenosis, which imposes a significant medical and 
 
financial burden on the patient. In our series, 42 patients (15.73%)
required MIDCAB following PTCA in the mini-sternotomy group and 38 
 
patients (14.23%) in the minithoracotomy group.
Perception of pain is individualized. Nevertheless partial
quantification of these subjective symptoms can be provided by the 
 
use of scoring systems [Westin 1997], which provide a framework for 
 
comparing the two approaches. In our series, on the first POD, pain 
 
was found to be the same in both groups, but on subsequent days pain 
 
was significantly greater in patients operated on through left 
 
anterior minithoracotomy. Stretching of the intercostal nerves,
muscles, and parietal pleura may be the a contributory factor for 
 
the greater pain in the thoracotomy group. In the median sternotomy,
once the sternum is approximated and there is no sternal
instability, there is not much pain. Since the entire sternum is not 
 
incised, patients operated on through partial sternotomy do not 
 
experience significant pain and muscular tension in the back.
Adequate pain control is one of the important considerations for 
 
MIDCAB and is essential for reducing the length of stay in ICU and 
 
the hospital. Severe pain is know to cause reduction in respiratory
mechanics and mobility, and to increase sympathetic hormonal and 
 
metabolic activity [Sabanathan 1990]. If pain relief is not adequate
after MIDCAB surgery, then all its advantages may be negated due to 
 
the adverse effects of postoperative pain. Various analgesic
techniques are used after MIDCAB, which include nonsteroidal
anti-inflammatory drugs, intrathecal opioids, intercostal blocks,
intrapleural analgesia, and thoracic epidural analgesia [Mehta
1998]. In our series, the nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory agent
ketorolac was found to provide adequate pain control
postoperatively, although the analgesic requirement was greater in 
 
the minithoracotomy group.
In conclusion, in terms of post operative pain and IMA 
 
characteristics, significant differences can be seen between the 
 
results of left anterior minithoracotomy and ministernotomy. From 
 
the first POD onwards, patients having a ministernotomy perceive
less pain, and the significantly longer IMA in ministernotomies can 
 
be a major advantage over minithoracotomy. Conversion to standard
median sternotomy from a ministernotomy is much easier should the 
 
need arise, and the procedure has a shorter learning period for the 
 
surgeon and does not require specialized instrumentation.
 
AUTHOR/ARTICLE INFORMATION
 
 
Presented at the Third Annual Meeting of the International Society
for Minimally Invasive Cardiac Surgery, Atlanta, Georgia, June 8−10,
2000.
Address correspondence and reprint request to: Dr. Rajneesh
Malhotra, Escorts Heart Institute and Research Centre, Okhla Road,
New Delhi-110025, India, Phone: 0091−11−6825000, 0091−11−6825001,
Fax: 0091−11−6825013, Email: malhotrarajneesh@hotmail.com ;
ehirc@vsnl.com
Keywords: coronary bypass, ministernotomy, minithoracotomy,
postoperative pain, MIDCAB, LIMA, LAD.
 
REFERENCES
 
 
1. BARI (Bypass Angioplasty Revascularization Investigation)
Investigators. Comparison of coronary bypass surgery with 
 
angioplasty in patients with multivessel disease. N Eng J Med 
 
335:217−25, 1996.
2. Coulson AS. Minimally invasive coronary artery surgery. J Thorac
Cardiovasc Surg 115:486−7, 1998a.
3. Coulson AS, Bakshey SA. The «T-MIDCAB» procedure use of extension
grafts from the undisturbed internal mammary artery in high-risk
patients. Heart Surg Forum #1998−71371(1):54−9, 1998b.
4. de Jaegere PP, Eefting FD, Stella PR, et al. Revascularization of 
 
patients with coronary artery disease: The interventional
cardiologist's perspective. Ann Thorac Surg 63:S23−7, 1997. MEDLINE
5. Heres KE, Marquez J, Makowski JM, et al. Minimally invasive
direct coronary bypass: Anesthetic monitoring and pain control
considerations. J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth 12(40):385−9, 1998.
MEDLINE
6. Jullian OC, Lopez-Beliom M, Dye WS, et al. The median sternal
incision in intracardiac surgery with extracorporeal circulation: A 
 
general evaluation of its use in heart surgery. Surgery 42:753−61,
1957.
7. Mehta Y, Swaminathan M, Mishra Y, et al. A comparative evaluation
of intrapleural and thoracic epidural analgesia for postoperative
pain relief after minimally invasive direct coronary artery bypass
surgery. J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth 12(2):162−5, 1998. MEDLINE
8. Nataf P, Lima L, Regan M, et al. Minimally invasive coronary
surgery with thoracoscopic internal mammary artery dissection:
Surgical technique. J Cardiac Surg 11:288−292, 1996.
9. Pocock SJ, Henderson R, Rickards A, et al. Meta-analysis of 
 
randomized trials comparing coronary angioplasty with bypass
surgery. Lancet 346:1184−9, 1995. MEDLINE
10. Ribakove GH. Minimally invasive port access CABG with early
angiographic follow-up. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 115:1101−10, 1998.
MEDLINE
11. Sabanathan S, Eng J, Mearns AJ. Alterations in respiratory
mechanics following thoracotomy. J R Coll Surg Edinburg 35:144−50,
1990.
12. Westaby S, Benetti EJ. Less invasive coronary surgery: Consensus
from the Oxford Meeting. Ann Thorac Surg 62(3):924−31, 1996. MEDLINE
13. Westin L, Carlsson R, Israelsson B, et al. Quality of life in 
 
patients with ischemic heart disease: A prospective controlled
study. J Intern Med 242:239−47, 1997. MEDLINE
 

Поделиться:




Комментарии
Смотри также
19 декабря 2001  |  00:12
Clinical Outcomes and Angiographic Patency in 125 Consecutive
Clinical Outcomes and Angiographic Patency in 125 Consecutive
19 декабря 2001  |  00:12
Coronary Artery Exposure in Off-Pump CABG: A Word of Caution
Coronary Artery Exposure in Off-Pump CABG: A Word of Caution
19 декабря 2001  |  00:12
Does Avoidance of Cardiopulmonary Bypass Decrease the Incidence of
Does Avoidance of Cardiopulmonary Bypass Decrease the Incidence of
19 декабря 2001  |  00:12
Low Ejection Fraction Is Not a Contraindication to Off-Pump
Low Ejection Fraction Is Not a Contraindication to Off-Pump
19 декабря 2001  |  00:12
Totally endoscopic myocardial revascularization (experimental study).
Totally endoscopic myocardial revascularization (experimental study).